Berco Wilsenach
Die identiteit van ruimte - behorendheid
tot ruimte
Deur op gereelde grondslag tussen Europa en Afrika
te reis en te werk, het ek besef dat die identiteit van die self
omvat word in die behorendheid tot ʼn spesifieke kultuur, taal-
en etniese klassifikasiestelsel. Dit is slegs binne die kollektiewe
norring wat die self gedefinieer kan word deur óf die vereenselwiging
óf die distansiëring van daardie groep. Toenemend het
ek ook die invloed van ruimte op sosiale strukture en die indentifisering
van die self binne fisiese en sosiale ruimtes, waargeneem.
Ruimte word volgens kultuur, tradisie en die fisiese
omgewing verskillend geïnterpreteer. Die waarde van oop ruimte
sal byvoorbeeld totaal ander betekenis hê binne ʼn Europese
en Afrika konteks. Verder is daar ʼn direkte verwantskap tussen
ruimte en die manifestasie en plasing van vorm, daarbinne. Fisiese
ruimte (of die gebrek daaraan), bepaal die gestalte van kulturele
uitdrukking. Dit kom die duidelikste in argitektuur en die visuele
kunste na vore en verleen derhalwe identiteit aan kulture ekspressie.
Omdat kultuur ‘n uitdrukking is van menslike beywering, word
ruimte onlosmaaklik verweef in die identiteit van ʼn gemeenskap.
Insig in die manipulasie van ʼn bepaalde ruimte deur die sistematisering
van vorm in ʼn gemeenskap, bied dus ʼn refleksie op en persepsie
in daardie gemeenskap.
Vorm word nie net voorgeskryf deur fisiese ruimte
nie maar ook deur mentale ruimte en word in ʼn voorafopgestelde
hiërargie van klas, kultuur, gender, land en selfs halfrond,
geplaas. Die massa (beide omsluit in formele en sosiale strukture),
word saamgestel deur die individu en word gereguleer deur hierdie
hiërargie. Vorm is dus ʼn uitvloeisel van hiërargie
van sosiale waardes en ekonomiese stand. Vorm staan in verband met
of behoort aan ʼn sekere ruimte en sal uit konteks wees indien
dit geruil sou word. Hierdie is nie soseer ʼn formele verplasing
as wat sosiale norme dit sou
Die gemeenskap verlang die instandhouding van hierdie
hiërargie en sal, na die ingryping van eksterne kragte soos
politiese skommeling, natuurlike rampe en oorlog, neig om vorige
fisiese sowel as sosiale strukture te herstel en te benadruk, eerder
as om die identiteit van ruimte en hulle behorendheid tot daardie
tyd en ruimte te herinterpreteer.
Deur die interpretasie en manipulasie van die uitstalruimte,
is die installasiediptiek La gerarchia dello spazio (Die
hiërargie van ruimte) – Centro della Creatività,
Palazzo Ducale, Genoa, 2004, 2 x (2m x 2m x 1,8m) – ʼn
interpretasie van hierdie gewaarwording. Dit bestaan uit twee installasies
in twee naasmekaarstaande, gelyksoortige ruimtes met lae gewelfplafonne.
Eerstens is ʼn magdom vissinkers individueel aan vislyn gehang
om die illusie van ʼn omgekeerde piramidale vorm te skep. ʼn
Meganisme slaan met gereelde tussenposes teen die struktuur waaraan
hulle hang om sodoende in te gryp en die vorm in ossilasie te bring.
Dit kom geleidelik tot stilstand net om van vooraf omvergewerp te
word. Die tweede bestaan uit ʼn gelyke hoeveelheid wit volstruisvere.
Weereens is elkeen individueel geplaas maar die massa vorm ʼn
normale piramide met die punt na bo. Dit word intern verlig en waaiers
waai met tussenposes liggies daarop om die vaste vorm te verander.
Beide ruimtes word verder geaktiveer deur die voortdurende en dartelende
spel van skadus teen die plafonne. Betekenis word nie net oorgedra
in die manipulasie van die ruimte nie maar ook in die keuse van
media wat oor ʼn inherente sosiale begrip beskik.
|
|
La gerarchia
dello spazio, installazione 2 (foto L. Carretta)
|
|
|
La gerarchia
dello spazio, installazione 1 (foto M. Oliva)
|
Berco Wilsenach
Identity of Space - Space of Belonging
Travelling and working between South Africa and
Europe, I have come to realize that the identity of the self is
encompassed within belonging to a specific culture, language and
ethnic classification system. It is only within a collective mass
that the self can be defined - either associating or disassociating
with that group. Increasingly I also became aware of the influence
of space on social structures and the identification of the self
within physical and social spaces.
Space is being interpreted differently according
to culture, tradition and the physical environment. The significance
of empty space for example, will carry a totally different meaning
within a European and African context. There exists further a direct
relationship between space and the manifestation and placement of
form within this space. Physical space (or the lack thereof) determines
the shape of cultural expression, most obviously noticeable in architecture
and the visual arts and thus bestows identity to cultural expression.
Culture being an expression of human endeavour, space is henceforth
intricately intertwined into the identity of society. Understanding
the manipulation of a specific space through the systematisation
of form by a society allows thus a reflection of and perception
into that community.
Form is not only dictated by physical space but
also by mental space and is placed within a predetermined hierarchy
of class, culture, gender, country, even a distinction is drawn
between northern and southern hemispheres. The mass (encompassed
in both formal and social structures) is constituted by the individual
and regulated by this hierarchy. Form is thus a direct consequence
of a hierarchy of social values and economic standing. Form also
relates or belongs to a certain space and will be out of context
should it be exchanged. This is not so much a formal displacement
but rather the predetermined norms of a society that would consider
it deranged.
Furthermore, society yearns for the upkeep of this
hierarchy and would, after the intervention of external forces like
political upheaval, natural disasters and war, tend to re-instate
and reinforce prior physical as well as social structures, rather
than to reinterpret the identity of space and their belonging to
that particular time and space.
Through the interpretation and manipulation of
the exhibition space, the installation diptych La Gerarchia
dello spazio (The hierarchy of space) – Centro della
Creatività, Palazzo Ducale, Genoa, 2004 2 x (2m x 2m x 1,8m)
– is an interpretation of this percipience. It consists of
two installations in two adjoining, similar spaces with very low,
vaulted ceilings. Firstly a multitude of lead sinkers are individually
suspended from fishing lines, creating the illusion of an inverted
pyramidal form. A mechanism hits against the structure to which
the sinkers are attached at frequent intervals, intervening and
shaking the stationary shape. It gradually comes to a standstill,
just to be disrupted again. The second consists of an equal amount
of white ostrich feathers. Individually standing upright, the mass
creates a normal pyramid with the apex facing upwards. Lit from
inside and with fans blowing at regular intervals gently on them,
the fixed form is brought into motion. Both spaces are further activated
by the constant and changing play of shadows against the ceiling.
Meaning is not only conveyed through the manipulation of space and
form but the selection of media carry their own inherent social
understanding.
(trad.:dell’autore)
|